The New No.2 Yahoo

In last month's report on Yahoos, The No.2 Yahoo (May 2022; see the footnote for an explanation of Yahoos), I noted,

For the first time that I can remember, a news source other than Chess.com tallied at least ten stories, with ChessBase accounting for exactly ten.

In the competitive world of chess journalism, fame is fleeting. The details follow...

Instead of the usual 100 stories, this month the Google news search returned 99. A full 20 of those stories were from previous months, leaving 79 for the current month. The chart on the left shows that only six sources accounted for two or more stories. Doing the math means 45 sources had a single story.

No.2 on the list is a surprise. We've seen the New York Times (NYT) before, most notably in Three Times Yahoos (July 2021). Even then it trailed no.2 ChessBase, which checked in with five stories, the same as our current month.

Two of the NYT stories were of the type 'Play NYT Chess Puzzle', e.g. 'Play NYT Chess Puzzle: Carlsen Versus Karjakin'. This redirected to Chess Replay: You Versus Karjakin (nytimes.com; Daniel Naroditsky), which included an invitation:-

Take on Sergey Karjakin in a recreation of a World Championship game in New York, 2016. Solve for the best series of moves.

I wasn't able to go any further because 'This article is exclusive to Games subscribers.' Is it a puzzle or is it a type of solitaire chess? I'll probably never know. Of the other five NYT stories the earliest was:-

• 2022-06-13: How to Play Chess (nytimes.com; Isaac Aronow) • 'Your guide to getting started with chess, and the New York Times chess puzzle.'

This led to an article that was not on the list of Yahoos:-

• 2022-06-12: Meet The Times's New Chess Columnist (nytimes.com; Deb Amlen) • 'For Daniel Naroditsky, a career in the royal game may not be as lucrative as one at a hedge fund, but he is exactly where he wants to be.'

GM Naroditsky wants to be producing a daily chess puzzle for a mainstream (although very prestigious) newspaper that has rediscovered chess two years after the boom started by covid and Netflix? Earth to NYT : There are dozens (hundreds?) of chess sites that have thousands (hundreds of thousands?) of chess puzzles for FREE. A couple of other NYT Yahoos were:-

• 2022-06-15: 'Want to Play Some Chess?' • (nytimes.com; Julia Carmel); 'The sounds of a late-night game around New York City.'; and
• 2022-06-17: Chess is Booming • (nytimes.com; By Greg Keener); 'Chess hasn't seen popularity like this since the 1972 World Chess Championship.'

Is the sudden NYT interest a signal that the chess boom is ending? Let's hope not. I should be able to track the NYT's success in future Yahoo posts. Signing Naroditsky was a good start, but it will take more than that.

The big story I expected to see this month was the 2022 Candidates Tournament, currently being played in Madrid. Of the 79 stories, eight were related to the candidates event. Of those eight, half were of the genre 'facts-about-chess-championships', like this one:-

• 2022-06-22: When was the last time an American was world chess champion? (bolavip.com)

No prizes for knowing that it was exactly 50 years ago. How high will the Madrid Candidates figure on the list of July Yahoos? We'll find out in a month.

[Yahoos (mainstream news stories about chess) are derived from Google News top-100 (or so) stories from the past month.]

TCEC/CCC 2022-H1 Summary

Another half-year has elapsed since TCEC/CCC 2021-H2 Summary (December 2021), making this post the right place for another summary. For an explanation of the columns in the table, see that previous summary.

TCEC/CCC	Off-week
2022-01-03: TCEC FRC4 Semifinals, CCC16 Bullet Finals : Both Underway	2022-01-10: Ipmanchess
2022-01-17: Stockfish Wins Both TCEC FRC4 and CCC16 Bullet Events	2022-01-24: Correspondence Forums in the 2000s
2022-01-31: TCEC S22 Underway; CCC16 Blitz Nears Final	2022-02-07: 'Reasonable Support' Required?
2022-02-14: TCEC S22 L3 and CCC16 Blitz Final Both Underway	2022-02-21: Breaking the 3400 Barrier
2022-02-28: TCEC S22 L1, CCC17 Rapid : Both Underway	2022-03-07: ICGA/AI4S ACG 2021
2022-03-14: TCEC S22 DivP, CCC17 Rapid : Both Underway	2022-03-21: Stockfish Sparkles
2022-03-28: The TCEC/CCC Hegemony	2022-04-04: Stockfish Breaks All the Barriers
2022-04-11: TCEC Stockfish; CCC Stockfish	2022-04-18: The CCC16 Season
2022-04-25: TCEC S22, the Fish Again; CCC17 Bullet Top-3	2022-05-02: Thirtysomething Fritz
2022-05-09: TCEC/CCC: Stockfish no.1; Dragon, LCZero - Who's Better?	2022-05-16: 25 Years Ago in Chess History
2022-05-23: TCEC Cup 10 Underway; Stockfish Wins CCC17 Bullet	2022-05-30: Eight-piece Tablebase in the Lab
2022-06-20: Stockfish Wins TCEC Cup 10; TCEC Swiss 3, CCC17 Blitz both Underway

The focus of the last few TCEC/CCC posts has been to answer the question asked in the post dated 2022-05-09: 'Dragon, LCZero - Who's Better?'. One week it's Dragon; next week it's LCZero. What answers will the next six months bring?

Worst Behavior as a Youtuber?

In this blog's long-running series on The Sociology of Chess (November 2016), I often use leftover videos from the blog's monthly featured video, which was almost always published on Youtube during the previous month. Last month's A Man Who Would Be King (May 2022), is the most recent example.

On this month's short list was the video shown first in the screen capture below. It's good enough to promote on this blog, but I had the feeling that I'd seen it before. Sure enough, it's the video shown second in the screen capture, and was published almost four years ago.

The person(s) responsible for the first video removed all traces of its source, thereby giving the impression that their video was original work. I've noted the clip's Youtube channel and will avoid using any other videos in future posts.

Hatchet Job

My favorite book about the 1972 Fischer - Spassky Title Match is 'Bobby Fischer vs. the Rest of the World' by Brad Darrach. I've mentioned the book before, most recently in Was Fischer Really Against the Whole World? (September 2017). Sometimes described as a Fischer 'biography', the book is neither that nor is it about the chess of the match. It is instead a first hand account of what it took to get Fischer to play the match, organized chronologically.

The book has been much maligned by leaders of the chess community. In Brad Darrach and The Dark Side of Bobby Fischer, Edward Winter, the foremost chess historian of the modern era, quotes several key sources who panned the book. Although Winter never gives specific instances of Darrach having misstated facts, it is clear that his opinion aligns with those he quotes when he mentions that 'demeaning phrase: "According to Darrach"'. He twice quotes others who called Darrach's book a 'hatchet job'.

Winter gives many quotes from Fischer's main biographer, Frank Brady, in the September 1977 CHESS magazine. All of the quotes beg further comment, but one quote struck me as particularly unfair:-

A large part of the book covers Fischer’s peregrinations before deciding to go to Iceland. Darrach weaves a colourful account of those moments and quotes long sections of dialogue, as though he were on the scene and heard the specific conversation. In fact, Darrach was already in Iceland, Fischer was in New York and most of the material that Darrach relates as history is just an exercise of his imagination.

In another recent post, Bobby Fischer Day by Day (May 2022), I introduced 'a site that offers [Fischer] newspaper clippings in chronological order'. More accurately described as a family of blogs, the site includes a post Brad Darrach's History of Defamation Before Bobby Fischer Met Him (bfchos.blogspot.com; June 2018; 'Bobby Fischer Chess Hall of Shame'). Although the writer/blogger is not at the same level as Winter, the post echoes Brady's criticism, saying,

This demonstrates the lack of personal knowledge of Darrach about Bobby Fischer. His articles persistently cite third parties, as if Darrach had an "inside scoop" on Fischer's personal life, relying on hearsay and embellishing with his wild imagination and passing his speculation off as "factual news" and even a "biography".

In the last section of his book, 'Acknowledgments', Darrach wrote,

The summer of '72 was one of those moments when life imitated art. Sometimes it seemed that The Author of Us All -- part Sophocles, part Mel Brooks -- had decided to write, produce and direct the damnedest happening that ever happened. More often it seemed that Bobby Fischer was in full charge of everything and everybody.

I want to thank Bobby for this book -- without him, nothing it describes would have happened.

I also want to thank everyone Bobby drew into the vortex of his demon -- all the people who appear in the pages of this book and dozens who do not. They gave me hundreds of interviews that took up hundreds of hours. More essential, they gave me the chance to lean in close and watch them live.

I cannot thank them all here but I must expressly thank Gudmundur Thorarinsson, Fred Cramer, Paul Marshall, Andrew Davis, Ed Edmondson, Frank Skoff, Saemundur Palsson, Boris Spassky, Chester Fox, Richard Stein, Jack and Ethel Collins, Joan Targ, Bill Lombardy, Larry Evans, Robert Byrne, Lubomir Kavalek, Arthur Bisguier, Isaac Kashdan, Don Schultz, Frank Brady, Milunka Lazarevich, I. S. Turover, George Koltanowski, James Slater, David Frost, Leonard Barden, Nicholas Bethell, Hans Indridason, Tedd Hope, Bob Hallowell, Herb Hochstetter, Morris Dubinsky and the Saidy family.

Darrach apparently took the notes from his 'hundreds of interviews that took up hundreds of hours', storyboarded them in chronological order, and constructed dialog based on the words of his interviewees. The result might not be literally true, but it's not fiction either. Near the end of his analysis, Winter writes,

At the end of the Brady article CHESS [B.H.Wood] opined: 'Darrach is sometimes grudgingly fair to Fischer but obviously loathes him.'

I've read the Darrach book several times and found little to support that last statement. In the November 1972 Chess Life, Anthony Saidy, one of the most quoted personalities in Darrach's book, wrote a four page article, 'A Tale of Two Titans - Ten Weeks That Shook the Chess World'. In the first paragraph he revealed a telling anecdote about Fischer's behavior during the match and gave its source in a footnote:-

Revealed in LIFE by Brad Darrach, one of the minority of journalists sympathetic to Fischer. - AS

The same anecdote is repeated in chapter nine of 'BF vs. the World', where we learn that Darrach was present at the scene. How many of his critics can say the same?

June 1972 & 1997 'On the Cover'

Our monthly look at American chess magazines from 50 and 25 years ago, like last month's May 1972 & 1997 'On the Cover' (May 2022), always shows two covers. This month we have three. All three covers relate to major milestones in chess history, as I mentioned this last month in A Year of Anniversaries (May 2022).

Top: '"But, Boris, what if he doesn't play 1.P-K4?"'
Bottom Left: '$700,000 for the winner ... Deep Blues for the loser!'
Bottom Right: 'Deeper Blue beats Kasparov'

Chess Life & Review (50 Years Ago)

A commissioned drawing marvelously executed by Bob Walker, a New York commercial artist. The likenesses of Spassky, Kosygin and Brezhnev have been magnificently captured.

In order from left to right: Spassky, Brezhnev, and Kosygin, plus Lenin on the wall. The books on the left are opening references for 1.e4. The newspaper at the bottom lists Fischer's crushing scores against his three opponents from the 1970-72 Candidates Matches. Ten years ago I featured the same famous cover in The Vanishing 1.P-K4 Prophecy (January 2012).

Chess Life (25 Years Ago)

If you noticed a similarity in design between this month's cover and this month's catalog cover, it is because the same person is responsible for both -- David Marsh. The popular Yugoslavian artist, Jovan Prokopljevic, provided the sketch of Kasparov. While it might seem more appropriate to portray Garry as the favorite (as the defending champion), IBM (thus far) has displayed a greater braggadocio than the world champion. Our money is still riding on Garry -- we know who he has been consulting!

A second paragraph explained the reason for two issues of CL in one month. Although I've read it many times, I don't understand what it says ('retarding the cover date'?).

Next month you will not see a date on the cover. We will be publishing a special issue about the Kasparov - Deep Blue match. Your July issue will arrive in early July. By retarding the cover date we will be able to consolidate our supplemental mailings (mailings that are made between the monthly magazine mailings) and realize a considerable savings.

Inside the June issue was a 'Spotlight' paragraph announcing that the match would take place 3-11 May in New York City. The cover story consisted of three color pages starting with an IBM press release. (When did the June issue go to press? In April? When was it mailed?) Another two page color spread was an advertisement for the 1997 U.S. Chessathon, 7 June, with an application to play in the event. 'Send [checks] with completed form by May 5th, 1997.' NB: CL coverage of the Chessathon will appear in the September issue.

Chess Life (Special Summer Issue)

This is definitely not a pretty picture. But Kevin Dyke has captured the essence of this man-versus-machine confrontation. The pressure on Garry Kasparov was unbelievable and Kevin was there at the right moment. IBM kept referring to this incarnation as "Deeper Blue" -- but perhaps that is better suited to describe Garry after game six.

The cover story filled 11 pages. The lead photo showed Kasparov at the board (next to a huge chess clock) and looking upwards. It was captioned, 'Did Garry see the handwriting on the wall?'. The story started,

"I've come to watch the best chessplayer in the world and Garry Kasparov", said IBM President Louis Gerstner on his arrival at the $1.1 million IBM Chess Challenge rematch on the eve of the fifth game.

The match story was written by IM Danny Kopec. The six games were annotated by GM Leonid Shamkovich or by GM Gabriel Schwartzman.

Stockfish Wins TCEC Cup 10; TCEC Swiss 3, CCC17 Blitz both Underway

Due to a vacation, it's been four weeks since my fortnightly report on the world's two foremost, ongoing engine vs. engine competitions: TCEC Cup 10 Underway; Stockfish Wins CCC17 Bullet (May 2022). The summary of that report is shorter than most summaries:-

TCEC: The site launched the 'Cup 10' event, using a 32-engine knockout format. • CCC: In the 'CCC17 Bullet Finals' Stockfish beat Dragon. The site is currently preparing the 'CCC17 Blitz Qualification' event, the first stage in the next multi-stage competition.

Given that Stockfish is the undisputed no.1 in the universe of chess engines, the last few posts have all tackled the issue of no.2:-

Back to the question 'Dragon, LCZero - Who's Better?'

Let's look at what happened during the month since the previous report.

TCEC: In 'Cup 10', Stockfish beat LCZero +4-2=4 in a semifinal match, then beat KomodoDragon +2-1=9 in the final match. LCZero beat Revenge +5-1=4 in the match for third place. Less than a week after 'Cup 10', the site launched 'Swiss 3' with 48 engines competing over 11 rounds. The event is currrently in the seventh round and should finish early in July.

For the final post on the TCEC's previous Swiss event, see KomodoDragon Wins TCEC Swiss 2; CCC16 Bullet Semifinals Underway (December 2021). Will KomodoDragon repeat its success? It is currently trailing tournament leader Stockfish by 1.5 points, with both engines still to play their seventh round matches.

CCC: In the 'CCC17 Blitz' event, the three engines that promoted from the 8-engine Qualification stage all finished in the bottom half of the 12-engine Main stage. Of the six engines that promoted from the Main stage, Stockfish, Dragon, and Lc0 finished in that order, well ahead of the other three engines.

The same pattern is holding for the Semifinal stage, with Dragon and Lc0 tied for second/third place. If they hold those places, they will meet in a 480-game Challenger match to decide which engine meets Stockfish in the match for the 480-game Final stage. The Semifinal finishes in a few days.

[For further information from the various stakeholders in the engine-to-engine events, see the tab 'TCEC/CCC Links' at the top of this page. • NB: Leela = LC0 = LCzero; Dragon = KomodoDragon]

Caissartistic License

For this month's Flickr Favorite, I had two photos on the short list, neither of which I understood. Since I couldn't choose between them, I decided to use both.

Left: A Deeper Form of Chess, 2017 by Sanford Biggers © Flickr user Peter E under Creative Commons.
Right: Robots Playing Chess © Flickr user Joe Shlabotnik under Creative Commons.

The description of the photo on the left said,

Medium/Technique: Found quilt and assorted textiles, polystyrene, aqua resin, and tar [...] Description: Work is formed of two pieces: a found antique pieced quilt hanging behind a life size figural sculpture, painted with tar and patches of found quilt. When the sculpture is placed in alignment with the hanging quilt it creates an impression of intersection and blending as the quilt segments align.

What does that mean? Pass. It definitely looks like it has something to do with chess.

The description of the photo on the right said,

In a store at the Grand Canal Shoppes at the Venetian.

That has nothing to do with the Grand Canal in Venice, Italy. It has everything to do with Las Vegas, Nevada. What I didn't understand about the photo: How do the robots move the pieces? Their arms are too short.